Search for: All records

The mental health crisis in the United States spotlights the need for more scalable training for mental health workers. While present-day AI systems have sparked hope for addressing this problem, we must not be too quick to incorporate or solely focus on technological advancements. We must ask empirical questions about how to ethically collaborate with and integrate autonomous AI into the clinical workplace. For these Human-Autonomy Teams (HATs), poised to make the leap into the mental health domain, special consideration around the construct of trust is in order. A reflexive look toward the multidisciplinary nature of such HAT projects illuminates the need for a deeper dive into varied stakeholder considerations of ethics and trust. In this paper, we investigate the impact of domain---and the ranges of expertise within domains---on ethics- and trust-related considerations for HATs in mental health. We outline our engagement of 23 participants in two speculative activities: design fiction and factorial survey vignettes. Grounded by a video storyboard prototype, AI- and Psychotherapy-domain experts and novices alike imagined TEAMMAIT, a prospective AI system for psychotherapy training. From our inductive analysis emerged 10 themes surrounding ethics, trust, and collaboration. Three can be seen as substantial barriers to trust and collaboration, where participants imagined they would not work with an AI teammate that didn't meet these ethical standards. Another five of the themes can be seen as interrelated, context-dependent, and variable factors of trust that impact collaboration with an AI teammate. The final two themes represent more explicit engagement with the prospective role of an AI teammate in psychotherapy training practices. We conclude by evaluating our findings through the lens of Mayer et al.'s Integrative Model of Organizational Trust to discuss the risks of HATs and adapt models of ability-, benevolence-, and integrity-based trust. These updates motivate implications for the design and integration of HATs in mental health work. 

To resist government and corporate use of facial recognition to surveil users through their personal images, researchers have created privacy-enhancing image filters that use adversarial machine learning. These “sub- versive AI” (SAI) image filters aim to defend users from facial recognition by distorting personal images in ways that are barely noticeable to humans but confusing to computer vision algorithms. SAI filters are limited, however, by the lack of rigorous user evaluation that assess their acceptability. We addressed this limitation by creating and validating a scale to measure user acceptance — the SAIA-8. In a three-step process, we apply a mixed-methods approach that closely adhered to best practices for scale creation and validation in measurement theory. Initially, to understand the factors that influence user acceptance of SAI filter outputs, we interviewed 15 participants. Interviewees disliked extant SAI filter outputs because of a perceived lack of usefulness and conflicts with their desired self-presentation. Using insights and statements from the interviews, we generated 106 potential items for the scale. Employing an iterative refinement and validation process with 245 participants from Prolific, we arrived at the SAIA-8 scale: a set of eight items that capture user acceptability of privacy-enhancing perturbations to personal images, and that can aid in benchmarking and prioritizing user acceptability when developing and evaluating new SAI filters. 

Background Even before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, children and adolescents were experiencing a mental health crisis, partly due to a lack of quality mental health services. The rate of suicide for Black youth has increased by 80%. By 2025, the health care system will be short of 225,000 therapists, further exacerbating the current crisis. Therefore, it is of utmost importance for providers, schools, youth mental health, and pediatric medical providers to integrate innovation in digital mental health to identify problems proactively and rapidly for effective collaboration with other health care providers. Such approaches can help identify robust, reproducible, and generalizable predictors and digital biomarkers of treatment response in psychiatry. Among the multitude of digital innovations to identify a biomarker for psychiatric diseases currently, as part of the macrolevel digital health transformation, speech stands out as an attractive candidate with features such as affordability, noninvasive, and nonintrusive. Objective The protocol aims to develop speech-emotion recognition algorithms leveraging artificial intelligence/machine learning, which can establish a link between trauma, stress, and voice types, including disrupting speech-based characteristics, and detect clinically relevant emotional distress and functional impairments in children and adolescents. Methods Informed by theoretical foundations (the Theory of Psychological Trauma Biomarkers and Archetypal Voice Categories), we developed our methodology to focus on 5 emotions: anger, happiness, fear, neutral, and sadness. Participants will be recruited from 2 local mental health centers that serve urban youths. Speech samples, along with responses to the Symptom and Functioning Severity Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire 9, and Adverse Childhood Experiences scales, will be collected using an Android mobile app. Our model development pipeline is informed by Gaussian mixture model (GMM), recurrent neural network, and long short-term memory. Results We tested our model with a public data set. The GMM with 128 clusters showed an evenly distributed accuracy across all 5 emotions. Using utterance-level features, GMM achieved an accuracy of 79.15% overall, while frame selection increased accuracy to 85.35%. This demonstrates that GMM is a robust model for emotion classification of all 5 emotions and that emotion frame selection enhances accuracy, which is significant for scientific evaluation. Recruitment and data collection for the study were initiated in August 2021 and are currently underway. The study results are likely to be available and published in 2024. Conclusions This study contributes to the literature as it addresses the need for speech-focused digital health tools to detect clinically relevant emotional distress and functional impairments in children and adolescents. The preliminary results show that our algorithm has the potential to improve outcomes. The findings will contribute to the broader digital health transformation. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/46970 

Past research has demonstrated that accounts of trusted others can provide additional context into real world behavior relevant to clinical decision-making and patient engagement. Our research investigates the Social Sensing System, a concept which leverages trusted other feedback for veterans in therapy for PTSD. In our two phase study, we work with 10 clinicians to develop text-message queries and realistic scenarios to present to patients and trusted others. We then present the results in the form of a storyboard to 10 veterans with PTSD and 10 trusted others and gather feedback via semi-structured interview and survey. We find that while trusted other feedback may provide a unique and useful perspective, key design features and considerations of underlying relationships must be considered. We present our findings and utilize the mechanisms and conditions framework to assess the power dynamics of systems such as social sensing in the mental health realm. 

Veterans are a unique marginalized group facing multiple vulnerabilities. Current assessments of veteran needs and support largely come from first-person accounts guided by researchers' prompts. Social media platforms not only enable veterans to connect with each other, but also to self-disclose experiences and seek support. This paper addresses the gap in our understanding of veteran needs and their own support dynamics by examining self-initiated and ecologically-valid self-expressions. In particular, we adopt the Veteran Critical Theory (VCT) to conduct a computational study on the Reddit community of veterans. Using topic modeling, we find veteran-friendly gestures with good intentions might not be appreciated in the subreddit. By employing transfer learning methodologies, we find this community has more informational and emotional support behaviors than general online communities and a higher prevalence of informational support than emotional support. Lastly, an examination of support dynamics reveals some contrasts to previous scholarship in military culture and social media. We discover that positive language and author platform tenure have negative relations with posts receiving replies and replies getting votes, and that replies reflecting personal disclosures tend to get more votes. Through the lens of VCT, we discuss how online communities can help uncover veterans' needs and provide more effective social support. 

Adolescents with chronic conditions must work with family caregivers to manage their illness experiences. To explore how technology can support collaborative documentation of these experiences, we designed and distributed a paper diary probe kit in a two-week field deployment with 12 adolescent–parent dyads (24 participants). Three insights emerged from the study that highlight how technology can support shared illness management: 1) provide scaffolds to recognize physical and emotional experiences in the context of daily activities; 2) help families reconstruct patient experiences; and 3) adapt to individual preferences for capturing, representing and sharing experiences. We discuss opportunities for HCI research that follow from these findings and conclude by reflecting on the benefits and limitations of using diary probes with adolescent patients and their parental caregivers.